A better way to protect UI quality.

Modern web applications change constantly, but most visual testing approaches still assume static interfaces.

Functional tests are great at verifying logic and behavior. They confirm that code runs and flows complete successfully. What they don’t tell you is whether the interface still makes sense visually, whether elements overlap, spacing breaks, or hierarchy becomes unclear.

Traditional visual regression tools rely heavily on screenshot comparisons. This works only when the UI changes slowly and predictably. In fast-moving products, even small, intentional design updates introduce noise, false positives, and constant maintenance overhead. Teams end up ignoring alerts or disabling visual checks altogether.

Manual QA can catch visual issues reliably, but it doesn’t scale. As release frequency increases and interfaces grow more complex, visual review becomes inconsistent, time-consuming, and easy to miss. Issues often surface only after users encounter them in production.

The result is a gap: visual bugs slip through even when tests pass and deployments look “successful.”

We treat the user interface as a system, not a collection of screenshots.

Modern web UIs are dynamic. Layouts adapt to screen sizes, content changes over time, and components evolve with each release. In this environment, simple screenshot comparisons break down quickly and generate noise instead of insight.

Our approach focuses on understanding the structure of the UI: layout relationships, spacing, hierarchy, and visual consistency across states and environments. Instead of asking “what changed pixel by pixel?”, we ask “does this interface still make sense visually?”

By analyzing UI intent rather than static images, we can detect real visual issues while avoiding false positives caused by expected changes. This makes visual feedback more reliable, easier to trust, and better suited for fast-moving product teams.

The goal is simple: provide accurate visual signals that keep pace with modern development without slowing teams down.

This product is built for teams where the interface changes often and visual quality matters.

It’s a strong fit for teams shipping frequent updates, working with complex or custom UI, and needing confidence that their product still looks right after every change.

Especially useful for teams where manual QA can’t keep up and visual issues tend to surface only after users notice them.

The product is currently in development and available via early access. We’re working closely with early users to shape the final experience.

Built by an experienced engineering team based in Poland, with hands-on experience shipping and maintaining modern web products.

The product is shaped by real production issues, not theoretical test cases.

This product is being built iteratively, with a strong focus on real UI problems seen in production.

You can explore how it works or join early access to help shape what comes next.